Original Articles |
From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (T.-C.H., P.C.Y.), Department of Pediatrics (T.U.), Department of Pathology and Stem Cell Institute (I.W.), and Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (A.C., G.H., A.Y.S., R.C.R.); Stanford University, Stanford, Calif; Mackay Memorial Hospital and Mackay Medicine, Nursing and Management College, Taipei, Taiwan (T.-C.H.); and Department of Radiology (Division of MR Research), Biomedical Engineering, and Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering and Cellular Imaging Section/Vascular Biology Program, Institute for Cell Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (J.M.B.).
Correspondence to Phillip C. Yang, MD, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, Room H-2157, Stanford, CA 94305-5233. E-mail pyang{at}cvmed.stanford.edu
Received January 22, 2008; accepted May 19, 2008.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and Results— Mice underwent left anterior descending artery ligation followed by transplantation of dual-labeled mESCs with superparamagnetic iron oxide and luciferase via direct injection into 3 different zones of myocardial infarction: intra-infarction, peri-infarction, and normal (remote). One day after transplantation, magnetic resonance imaging enabled assessment of the precise anatomic locations of mESCs. Bioluminescence imaging allowed longitudinal analysis of cell viability through detection of luciferase activity. Subsequent evaluation of myocardial regeneration and functional restoration was performed by echocardiography and pressure–volume loop analysis. Using 16-segment analysis, we demonstrated precise localization of dual-labeled mESCs. A strong correlation between histology and magnetic resonance imaging was established (r=0.962, P=0.002). Bioluminescent imaging data demonstrated that cell viability in the remote group was significantly higher than in other groups. Echocardiography and pressure–volume loop analysis revealed improved functional restoration in animals treated with mESCs, although myocardial regeneration was not observed.
Conclusions— Multimodality evaluation of mESC engraftment in the heterogeneous tissue of myocardial infarction is possible. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated accurate anatomic localization of dual-labeled mESCs. Bioluminescent imaging enabled assessment of variable viability of mESCs transplanted into the infarcted myocardium. Echocardiography and pressure–volume loop analysis validated the restorative potential of mESCs. Although mESCs transplanted into the remote zone demonstrated the highest viability, precise delivery of mESCs into the peri-infarction region might be equally critical in restoring the injured myocardium.
Key Words: heart failure myocardial infarction magnetic resonance imaging stem cells, embryonic
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical Perspective p 13
With the use of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)–labeled cells, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a primary modality to detect the ex vivo–labeled mESCs and to assess functional restoration of the injured myocardium.11–13 However, in vivo MR monitoring of stem cell transplantation is mostly limited to cell localization and functional restoration of the myocardial tissue. Fundamental biological information on cell viability cannot be obtained.14 To address this limitation, multimodality imaging has been implemented to assess stem cell engraftment in vivo.15 In addition to MRI, echocardiography and pressure–volume (PV) loop analysis have been implemented to assess myocardial function and regeneration, and bioluminescent imaging (BLI) has been used to detect molecular signal of cell viability. These enhanced capabilities enable a comprehensive assessment of stem cell engraftment and recipient tissue, including cellular location, viability, myocardial regeneration, and functional restoration.
The complementary strengths of the multimodality approach have been investigated systematically in a murine MI model to address the following: (1) localization of SPIO-labeled transplanted mESCs delivered into 3 different zones of MI, assessed with MRI; (2) viability of mESCs delivered into 3 different zones of the injured myocardium, assessed with BLI; and (3) functional restoration and regeneration of the myocardium, assessed with echocardiography and PV loop analysis.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell Labeling
To label mESCs, we used a commercially available ferumoxides suspension (Feridex IV, Berlex Laboratories, Wayne, NJ) that contains particles
80 to 150 nm in size and has a total iron content of 11.2 mg Fe/mL. Clinical-grade protamine sulfate (American Pharmaceuticals Partner, Schaumburg, Ill) was prepared as a stock solution of 1 mg/mL in distilled water. Ferumoxides (100 µg Fe/mL) was put into a tube containing serum-free RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen) containing 25 mmol/L HEPES and L-glutamine. Protamine sulfate was added to the ferumoxides solution at a concentration of 12 µg/mL and mixed for 5 to 10 minutes. An equal volume of labeling solution was added to the existing medium in the mESC culture and incubated for 12 to 24 hours. The final concentrations of ferumoxides and protamine sulfate in the cell culture medium were 50 µg Fe/mL and 6 µg/mL, respectively.16,17
Animals
Healthy female mice with severe combined immune deficiency (SCID) and male Balb/C mice (8 to 10 weeks of age; weight, 20 to 25 g) were housed at no more than 5 per cage in our American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care–approved facility with 12/12-hour light/dark cycles and free access to standard rodent chow and water. Stanford Universitys Administrative Panels on Laboratory Animal Care approved this protocol.
Left Coronary Ligation
Mice were anesthetized with inhaled isoflurane (2% to 3%). Mice were intubated and ventilated with a mouse respirator (model 687, Harvard Apparatus, Inc, Holliston, Mass), and anesthesia was maintained with inhaled isoflurane (0.75% to 1.5%). A left thoracotomy was performed in the fifth intercostal space, the left lung was retracted, and the pericardium was opened. The left anterior descending artery was permanently ligated with a 9.0 Ethilon suture just distal to the level of the left atrium. Blanching and dyskinesia of the anterolateral region of the left ventricle (LV) confirmed infarction.
mESC Transplantation
To test the hypothesis that MRI can provide accurate localization of SPIO-labeled mESCs (line TL-1, derived from 129Sv/J mice) in the injured myocardium, 2.5x105 SPIO-labeled mESCs (n=10) or 2.5x105 unlabeled mESCs (n=5) were transplanted by injection into the injured myocardium (volume, 25 µL) of Balb/C mice. To evaluate the viability of transplanted mESCs, 2.5x105 SPIO-labeled mESC-luc+ were transplanted by injection into 3 different zones of the injured myocardium (volume, 25 µL) of SCID mice in the following groups: intra-infarction group (total n=15), peri-infarction group (total n=15), remote/normal group (total n=10), and control group consisting of 25 µL phosphate-buffered saline injected into the intra-infarction area (total n=10). A thoracotomy tube was placed, and lungs were re-expanded by using positive pressure at end expiration. The chest cavity was closed in layers, and the animal was gradually weaned from the ventilator. Once spontaneous respiration resumed, the endotracheal tube and thoracostomy tube were removed, and the animal was placed in a warming station.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
One day after mESC transplantation, animals were imaged with a 4.7-T, 15-cm, horizontal-bore magnet with a volume coil with an inner diameter of 3.5 cm controlled by a Unity Inova console (Varian, Inc, Palo Alto, Calif). Animals were anesthetized with 1% to 2% isoflurane in 1 L/min oxygen. ECG gating was optimized by using 2 subcutaneous precordial leads. Respiratory rate was monitored, and body temperature was automatically maintained at 37°C (SA Instruments, Inc, Stony Brook, NY). Delayed-enhancement MRIs were acquired between 20 and 30 minutes after intraperitoneal injection of 0.3 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Berlex Laboratories, Wayne, NJ), and localization of the signal loss resulting from SPIO-labeled mESCs was detected with gated short-axis gradient recalled echo sequences (field of view, 3x3 cm; matrix, 128x128; repetition time/echo time, 160/3 ms).
The area of signal loss was then measured by tracing the contour with image analysis software (MRVision, Winchester, Mass). Using a 16-segment analysis at the location of MI, we compared the location of signal void by SPIO-labeled mESCs in the delayed-enhancement MRI among 3 delivery zones. Each zone was designated as one of the following: anterior wall, 1 to 3; lateral wall, 4 to 6; posterior wall, 7 to 10, and septal wall, 11 to 16.
Histology
At the end of the study, mice were euthanized, and their hearts were excised and sectioned along the short-axis plane, fixed in 10% formalin, and later embedded in paraffin blocks. Sections (4 µm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, Prussian blue to detect iron, and F4/80 (Abcam Inc, Cambridge, Mass) to detect murine macrophages. Three observers who were blinded to the experimental groups then outlined the borders of the mESC transplants with Spot Software version 3.4.2 (Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, Mich).
Correlation Between MRI and Histology
The MRIs and histological stains of the mid-LV18 were used to correlate the anatomic location of the labeled mESCs. The mid-LV was divided into 16 sectors. The cellular location was determined by in vivo MRI dephasing (negative) signal, and ex vivo Prussian blue stain with the 16-sector model was recorded. The median sector for both modalities was chosen and then correlated.
BLI Studies
To evaluate the longitudinal viability and proliferation of transplanted cells, BLI was serially acquired at days 2, 6, and 14 after cell transplantation. BLI uses light generated by the enzyme luciferase. The rate of luciferase enzyme turnover in the presence of the substrate luciferin is fast (t1/2=3 hours). The relationship between luciferase enzyme concentration and the peak height of emitted light in vitro is linear up to 7 to 8 orders of magnitude.19 The BLI system (In Vivo Imaging System, Caliper Life Sciences, Hopkinton, Mass) consists of a supersensitive, cooled (90°C) charge-coupled device camera mounted onto a light-tight imaging chamber. The charge-coupled device chip is 2.7 cm2 and consists of 2048x2048 pixels at 13.5 µm each for a spatial resolution of 3 to 5 mm.20 The system does not allow 3-dimensional imaging; hence, spatial resolution is limited to a compressed, 2-dimensional image for analysis. Images are acquired at 1- to 10-minute intervals until peak signal is observed. Both the In Vivo Imaging System and its imaging analysis software are commercially available (Caliper Life Sciences). High reproducibility (within ±8% SD from the mean values) and detection sensitivity of this system for monitoring luciferase reporter gene expression have been demonstrated in vivo. Luciferase generates most light activity 15 to 20 minutes after intraperitoneal injection of substrate luciferin at a dose of 30 mg/kg body weight (Caliper Life Sciences).15
Echocardiography
Echocardiography was performed with the General Electric Vivid7 Dimension imaging system equipped with a 13-MHz linear probe (GE, Milwaukee, Wis). Mice were assessed preoperatively and 4, 7, and 14 days after surgery. Animals were induced with isoflurane, received continuous inhaled anesthetic (1.5% to 2%) within the duration of the imaging session to maintain heart rate between 300 and 500 bpm, and were imaged in the supine position. Echocardiography was performed by an independent operator blinded to the study conditions. M-mode short-axis views of the LV were obtained and archived. Analysis of the M-mode images was performed with built-in GE analysis software. LV end-diastolic diameter, end-systolic diameter, wall thickness, and tissue Doppler imaging were obtained and used to calculate fractional shortening by the following formula: fractional shortening=(end-diastolic diameter – end-systolic diameter) / end-diastolic diameter.
PV Loop Analysis
PV loops were generated in anesthetized, instrumented mice 7 days after surgery. Briefly, mice were anesthetized as mentioned above. A 1.4F (0.46-mm) high-fidelity micromanometer catheter (Millar Instruments, Houston, Tex) was inserted into the right carotid artery and advanced retrogradely into the LV chamber.18 Two pairs of miniature omnidirectional piezoelectric crystals were implanted in the endocardium of the LV to obtain short- and long-axis cavity dimensions throughout the cardiac cycle. Simultaneous LV pressure and dimensions were recorded at baseline and during the decrease in preload generated by gently pulling a suture to transiently constrict the inferior vena cava. The ventilator was disconnected during data acquisition to eliminate the effects of positive ventilation. All data were recorded digitally and stored on a computer for offline analysis.
Statistical Analysis
All data are expressed as mean±SD. The correlation between the anatomic location of SPIO-labeled mESCs and MRIs was analyzed by Spearmans rank correlation coefficient. Comparison of BLI activities, fractional shortening, tissue Doppler imaging, and wall thickness from the same animals over time was made with the repeated-measures ANOVA technique. In making comparisons of PV loop analysis and echocardiography data between the mESC-treated and the control groups, we analyzed the data using Steel methods as a multiple comparison of nonparametric test. The distribution of the location of signal void by SPIO-labeled mESCs was compared among the 3 groups with
2 and Fisher exact tests. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The authors had full access to and take full responsibility for the integrity of the data. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Accurate Localization and Quantification of SPIO-Labeled mESCs in the 3 Zones of MI With MRI
In the in vitro setting, a significant linear correlation between the quantity of SPIO-labeled mESCs and the signal area by MRI was observed (r=0.987, P<0.0001; Figure 3B). Representative delayed-enhanced MRIs of 3 different delivery zones are shown in Figure 3C and 3E (intra-infarction, n=3; peri-infarction, n=3). The high-signal-intensity area indicating the injured myocardium distinguished the injured from the normal myocardium. Using 16-segment analysis, we detected the majority of the injured myocardium (anterolateral MI) in segments 1 through 6. The signal voids indicated that SPIO-labeled mESCs were observed in the following segments of the injured myocardium: peri-infarction, 1 through 3, 15, and 16 (Figure 3C and 3D); and intra-infarction, 4 through 7 (Figure 3E and 3F). Significant differences in the SPIO-labeled mESC distribution of 2 groups were found (P<0.05).
|
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several studies have demonstrated successful use of stem cells to restore injured myocardium.13,21–25 Development of a sensitive, noninvasive imaging technology to track the engraftment of the transplanted stem cells will be critical in monitoring the therapeutic efficacy of cell therapy. MRI with SPIO-based cell labeling techniques is emerging as the main diagnostic modality to track the transplanted stem cells, and several groups have reported that the robust detection of ex vivo–labeled stem cells delivered into the myocardial tissue was possible with clinically available SPIO agents such as Feridex IV.11,13,26,27 Effective in vivo imaging techniques to monitor stem cell therapy should provide such information as accurate localization, quantification, and viability of the delivered cells. Our study addresses some of the key challenges to evaluating cell engraftment parameters after cell delivery with a multimodality approach.
This study validates in vivo MRI-guided anatomic localization of transplanted mESCs within the heterogeneous infarcted myocardium. Conventional reporter gene techniques (eg, green fluorescent protein) or a thymidine analogue (eg, bromodeoxyuridine) to validate stem cell engraftment has depended mostly on postmortem immunohistological analysis. Through the use of BLI and positron emission tomography imaging techniques, survival of stem cells injected into the heterogeneous milieu of the infarcted myocardium has been demonstrated.15,28,29 Our results with the molecular reporter gene technique demonstrated that BLI activities significantly increased over time in all 3 groups and that mESCs transplanted into different zones of MI significantly altered cell survival. This observation suggests that the transplanted mESCs proliferated. However, this also could be consistent with teratoma formation found in 70% of the mice by histological analysis.29,30
Despite a decreased rate of mESC survival, precise delivery into the peri-infarction region demonstrated improved LV functions of the injured anterolateral myocardium. The data from the present study suggest the importance of both cell survival and location of cell delivery for optimal myocardial restoration. Although there was no histological evidence of regeneration in the injured myocardium except for teratoma formation, significant functional restoration was observed. These findings might indicate the strategic importance of local paracrine effects, cellular support by teratoma formation, precise myocardial delivery, and cell viability for effective cell therapy.
Finally, this study demonstrated the feasibility of multimodality imaging of mESC survival and myocardial restoration. First, the delayed-enhancement MR technique accurately detected in vivo the anatomic location of transplanted SPIO-labeled mESCs within the injured myocardium. Combining this capability to accurately localize mESC transplantation, in vivo MRI also may track cell engraftment through quantitative assessment of functional recovery longitudinally.31 Furthermore, BLI demonstrated variable survival of the transplanted cells and echocardiography/PV loop analysis–measured resultant myocardial restoration.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NIH K18 HL087198–01) and American Heart Association (beginning grant-in-Aid 0665189Y).
Disclosures
None.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Klug MG, Soonpaa MH, Koh GY, Field LJ. Genetically selected cardiomyocytes from differentiating embryonic stem cells form stable intracardiac grafts. J Clin Invest. 1996; 98: 216–224.[Medline]
3. Kehat I, Kenyagin-Karsenti D, Snir M, Segev H, Amit M, Gepstein A, Livne E, Binah O, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Gepstein L. Human embryonic stem cells can differentiate into myocytes with structural and functional properties of cardiomyocytes. J Clin Invest. 2001; 108: 407–414.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Boheler KR, Czyz J, Tweedie D, Yang HT, Anisimov SV, Wobus AM. Differentiation of pluripotent embryonic stem cells into cardiomyocytes. Circ Res. 2002; 91: 189–201.
5. Terami H, Hidaka K, Katsumata T, Iio A, Morisaki T. Wnt11 facilitates embryonic stem cell differentiation to Nkx2.5-positive cardiomyocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004; 325: 968–975.[CrossRef][Medline]
6. Balsam LB, Wagers AJ, Christensen JL, Kofidis T, Weissman IL, Robbins RC. Haematopoietic stem cells adopt mature haematopoietic fates in ischaemic myocardium. Nature. 2004; 428: 668–673.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Yuasa S, Itabashi Y, Koshimizu U, Tanaka T, Sugimura K, Kinoshita M, Hattori F, Fukami S, Shimazaki T, Ogawa S, Okano H, Fukuda K. Transient inhibition of BMP signaling by Noggin induces cardiomyocyte differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2005; 23: 607–611.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Etzion S, Battler A, Barbash IM, Cagnano E, Zarin P, Granot Y, Kedes LH, Kloner RA, Leor J. Influence of embryonic cardiomyocyte transplantation on the progression of heart failure in a rat model of extensive myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2001; 33: 1321–1330.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Min JY, Yang Y, Converso KL, Liu L, Huang Q, Morgan JP, Xiao YF. Transplantation of embryonic stem cells improves cardiac function in postinfarcted rats. J Appl Physiol. 2002; 92: 288–296.
10. Yang Y, Min JY, Rana JS, Ke Q, Cai J, Chen Y, Morgan JP, Xiao YF. VEGF enhances functional improvement of postinfarcted hearts by transplantation of ESC-differentiated cells. J Appl Physiol. 2002; 93: 1140–1151.
11. Kraitchman DL, Heldman AW, Atalar E, Amado LC, Martin BJ, Pittenger MF, Hare JM, Bulte JW. In vivo magnetic resonance imaging of mesenchymal stem cells in myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2003; 107: 2290–2293.
12. Hill JM, Dick AJ, Raman VK, Thompson RB, Yu ZX, Hinds KA, Pessanha BSB, Guttman MA, Varney TR, Martin BJ, Dunbar CE, McVeigh ER, Lederman RJ. Serial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of injected mesenchymal stem cells. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1009–1014.
13. Arai T, Kofidis T, Bulte JW, de Bruin J, Venook RD, Berry GJ, McConnell MV, Quertermous T, Robbins RC, Yang PC. Dual in vivo magnetic resonance evaluation of magnetically labeled mouse embryonic stem cells and cardiac function at 1.5 t. Magn Reson Med. 2006; 55: 203–209.[CrossRef][Medline]
14. Hoehn M, Kustermann E, Blunk J, Wiedermann D, Trapp T, Wecker S, Focking M, Arnold H, Hescheler J, Fleischmann BK, Schwindt W, Buhrle C. Monitoring of implanted stem cell migration in vivo: a highly resolved in vivo magnetic resonance imaging investigation of experimental stroke in rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99: 16267–16272.
15. Wu JC, Chen IY, Sundaresan G, Min JJ, De A, Qiao JH, Fishbein MC, Gambhir SS. Molecular imaging of cardiac cell transplantation in living animals using optical bioluminescence and positron emission tomography. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1302–1305.
16. Suzuki Y, Zhang S, Kundu P, Yeung AC, Robbins RC, Yang PC. In vitro comparison of the biological effects of three transfection methods for magnetically labeling mouse embryonic stem cells with ferumoxides. Magn Reson Med. 2007; 57: 1173–1179.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Arbab AS, Yocum GT, Kalish H, Jordan EK, Anderson SA, Khakoo AY, Read EJ, Frank JA. Efficient magnetic cell labeling with protamine sulfate complexed to ferumoxides for cellular MRI. Blood. 2004; 104: 1217–1223.
18. Auerbach MA, Schoder H, Hoh C, Gambhir SS, Yaghoubi S, Sayre JW, Silverman D, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR, Czernin J. Prevalence of myocardial viability as detected by positron emission tomography in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2921–2926.
19. Wu JC, Sundaresan G, Iyer M, Gambhir SS. Noninvasive optical imaging of firefly luciferase reporter gene expression in skeletal muscles of living mice. Mol Ther. 2001; 4: 297–306.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Massoud TF, Gambhir SS. Molecular imaging in living subjects: seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light. Genes Dev. 2003; 17: 545–580.
21. Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, Jakoniuk I, Anderson SM, Li B, Pickel J, McKay R, Nadal-Ginard B, Bodine DM, Leri A, Anversa P. Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature. 2001; 410: 701–705.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Schachinger V, Assmus B, Britten MB, Honold J, Lehmann R, Teupe C, Abolmaali ND, Vogl TJ, Hofmann WK, Martin H, Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM. Transplantation of progenitor cells and regeneration enhancement in acute myocardial infarction: final one-year results of the TOPCARE-AMI Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 1690–1699.
23. Assmus B, Honold J, Schachinger V, Britten MB, Fischer-Rasokat U, Lehmann R, Teupe C, Pistorius K, Martin H, Abolmaali ND, Tonn T, Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM. Transcoronary transplantation of progenitor cells after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 1222–1232.
24. Lunde K, Solheim S, Aakhus S, Arnesen H, Abdelnoor M, Egeland T, Endresen K, Ilebekk A, Mangschau A, Fjeld JG, Smith HJ, Taraldsrud E, Grogaard HK, Bjornerheim R, Brekke M, Muller C, Hopp E, Ragnarsson A, Brinchmann JE, Forfang K. Intracoronary injection of mononuclear bone marrow cells in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 1199–1209.
25. Schachinger V, Erbs S, Elsasser A, Haberbosch W, Hambrecht R, Holschermann H, Yu J, Corti R, Mathey DG, Hamm CW, Suselbeck T, Assmus B, Tonn T, Dimmeler S, Zeiher AM. Intracoronary bone marrow–derived progenitor cells in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 1210–1221.
26. Hill JM, Dick AJ, Raman VK, Thompson RB, Yu ZX, Hinds KA, Pessanha BS, Guttman MA, Varney TR, Martin BJ, Dunbar CE, McVeigh ER, Lederman RJ. Serial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of injected mesenchymal stem cells. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1009–1014.
27. Amsalem Y, Mardor Y, Feinberg MS, Landa N, Miller L, Daniels D, Ocherashvilli A, Holbova R, Yosef O, Barbash IM, Leor J. Iron-oxide labeling and outcome of transplanted mesenchymal stem cells in the infarcted myocardium. Circulation. 2007; 116 (suppl): I-38–I-45.[Medline]
28. Wu JC, Inubushi M, Sundaresan G, Schelbert HR, Gambhir SS. Optical imaging of cardiac reporter gene expression in living rats. Circulation. 2002; 105: 1631–1634.
29. Cao F, Lin S, Xie X, Ray P, Patel M, Zhang X, Drukker M, Dylla SJ, Connolly AJ, Chen X, Weissman IL, Gambhir SS, Wu JC. In vivo visualization of embryonic stem cell survival, proliferation, and migration after cardiac delivery. Circulation. 2006; 113: 1005–1014.
30. Li Z, Suzuki Y, Huang M, Cao F, Xie X, Connolly AJ, Yang PC, Wu JC Comparison of reporter gene and iron particle labeling for tracking fate of human embryonic stem cells and differentiated endothelial cells in living subjects. Stem Cells. 2008; 26: 864–873.
31. Yang Z, Berr SS, Gilson WD, Toufektsian MC, French BA. Simultaneous evaluation of infarct size and cardiac function in intact mice by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging reveals contractile dysfunction in noninfarcted regions early after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2004; 109: 1161–1167.
| Footnotes |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C. Wu Molecular Imaging: Antidote to Cardiac Stem Cell Controversy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 11, 2008; 52(20): 1661 - 1664. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | Circulation Journals Home | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |