Targeting High Oxygen Consumption to Prevent Cardiac Dysfunction in Patients With Aortic Valve Stenosis

In the aging population, an increasing number of people experience aortic valve stenosis (AS) and develop severe concentric hypertrophy in response to pressure overload of the left ventricle.1 Although aortic valve replacement (AVR) prevents worsening of cardiac disease, there is currently no treatment that effectively prevents the transition from compensatory hypertrophy to failure of the ventricle in patients with AS. Initially, the hypertrophic response of the ventricle in response to increased pressure is compensatory to preserve wall stress and systolic function. However, chronic overload of the ventricle induces pathological changes that ultimately cause failure of the ventricle. Defining the pathophysiologic mechanisms that underlie the transition from a compensatory to a failing hypertrophied ventricle is key to finding pharmacological treatment options for patients with AS. Imaging studies combining cardiovascular magnetic resonance and 11C-acetate positron-emission tomography to assess myocardial external efficiency (MEE), that is, the ratio between external work and myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2), revealed reduced MEE in patients with AS compared with controls.2 The hypertrophied ventricle of patients with symptomatic AS is characterized by high MVO2,2,3 indicative of high metabolic demand. To match the increased MVO2, adequate perfusion of the ventricle is crucial. Ongoing concentric hypertrophy of the heart, however, impairs coronary blood flow reserve,4 which may underlie angina pectoris in patients with AS and may worsen disease outcome. Coronary perfusion and energy supply to the heart muscle occurs during diastole; coronary inflow (ie, oxygen delivery) is determined by diastolic pressure and duration of diastole.5 Concentric hypertrophy will limit coronary flow, in particular, during increased stress (eg, exercise). Ischemic damage of the heart will cause irreversible changes to the heart muscle, including severe mitochondrial damage, collagen formation, and microvascular rarefaction. The increased MVO2 may represent a stress factor for the pressure-overloaded heart, and detrimental effects may be exacerbated during episodes of exercise. A detrimental effect of exercise has been shown in a mouse model with mild and severe transverse aortic constriction.6 In contrast to the beneficial effects of exercise in a mouse model with myocardial infarction,7 exercise tended to aggravate pathological cardiac remodeling and dysfunction in AS mice.6,8 These previous studies indicate that high MVO2 represents a target to prevent cardiac dysfunction in patients with AS. In patients with symptomatic AS, MEE increased and MVO2 decreased on AVR in patients with AS.2,9 Moreover, the AVR-induced increase in MEE was associated with improved exercise capacity assessed during cardiopulmonary exercise testing.2 However, AVR did not correct MEE in several patients with AS within a 4-month follow-up,2 which may suggest that irreversible damage occurred because of severe cardiac remodeling. As AVR is the final treatment option in patients with severe AS, it would be preferable if medical treatment could be initiated at an earlier stage in patients with asymptomatic AS. One way to reduce stress on the heart is by blocking adrenergic receptor stimulation with a β-blocker, a standard heart failure treatment in patients with reduced ejection fraction. β-blocker use has been associated with better prognosis in patients with AS.10 In the current issue of Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging, Hansson et al11 performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to study whether metoprolol could improve myocardial efficiency in patients with asymptomatic AS. Although treatment with β-blockers may be harmful because of the negative inotropic effect on an already overloaded ventricle, it may represent a therapy to reduce the increased metabolic demand caused by the pressure overload. Forty patients with asymptomatic AS were randomized to metoprolol or placebo treatment for 22 weeks.11 Metoprolol treatment reduced aortic valve gradients, global afterload, and MVO2, thereby improving myocardial efficiency. Hansson et al11 are the first to illustrate that β-blockade exerts hemodynamic benefit at an early disease stage in patients with AS. Future prospective studies with repeated measurement of myocardial efficiency in patients with AS are warranted to assess the long-term effect of therapy targeted at high MVO2.
See Article by Hansson et al
An alternative way to tackle high oxygen demand of the heart is by targeting cardiac metabolism.12–14 In the healthy heart, 95% of the energy demand is met by mitochondrial oxidation of fatty acids and carbohydrates, whereas 5% of ATP is produced via glycolysis. Although fatty acids represent the predominant fuel for the heart, they provide less ATP per oxygen molecule in comparison to carbohydrates.13,14 Agents that shift mitochondrial oxygenation away from the preferred fatty acids toward carbohydrates would reduce oxygen consumption to produce ATP. Interestingly, hypertrophied hearts shift their metabolism from fatty acids to glucose utilization and glycolytic metabolism, which may represent an attempt to optimize the energetic status of the overloaded heart. A study in human cardiac tissue from patients with AS revealed changes in cardiac substrate transporters and metabolic proteins as underlying causes of the modified metabolic flux in hypertrophied myocardium.15 Metabolic therapy in symptomatic (advanced) hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients corrected energy deficiency and improved exercise capacity.16 Thus, metabolic therapy may also represent a therapy to target high MVO2 in patients with asymptomatic AS. Treatment is expected to be most effective in patients with asymptomatic AS with increased MVO2. Patients with asymptomatic AS with increased hemodynamic burden may be identified by analysis of atrial dimensions and diastolic function at rest and during exercise.17 The key message from cardiovascular imaging studies is that chronically elevated MVO2 triggers maladaptive remodeling in patients with AS and warrants further investigation to develop preventive treatment strategies at early disease stage.
Disclosures
None.
Footnotes
The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.
- © 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- Güçlü A,
- Knaapen P,
- Harms HJ,
- Vonk AB,
- Stooker W,
- Groepenhoff H,
- Lammertsma AA,
- van Rossum AC,
- Germans T,
- van der Velden J
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- Westerhof N,
- Boer C,
- Lamberts RR,
- Sipkema P
- 6.↵
- van Deel ED,
- de Boer M,
- Kuster DW,
- Boontje NM,
- Holemans P,
- Sipido KR,
- van der Velden J,
- Duncker DJ
- 7.↵
- 8.↵
- de Waard MC,
- van der Velden J,
- Bito V,
- Ozdemir S,
- Biesmans L,
- Boontje NM,
- Dekkers DH,
- Schoonderwoerd K,
- Schuurbiers HC,
- de Crom R,
- Stienen GJ,
- Sipido KR,
- Lamers JM,
- Duncker DJ
- 9.↵
- Güçlü A,
- Knaapen P,
- Harms HJ,
- Parbhudayal RY,
- Michels M,
- Lammertsma AA,
- van Rossum AC,
- Germans T,
- van der Velden J
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
- Hansson NHS,
- Sörensen J,
- Harms HJ,
- Kim WY,
- Nielsen R,
- Tolbod LP,
- Frokiaer J,
- Bouchelouche K,
- Dodt KK,
- Sihm I,
- Poulsen SH,
- Wiggers H
- 12.↵
- 13.↵
- De Jong KA,
- Lopaschuk GD
- 14.↵
- Stanley WC,
- Recchia FA,
- Lopaschuk GD
- 15.↵
- 16.↵
- Abozguia K,
- Elliott P,
- McKenna W,
- Phan TT,
- Nallur-Shivu G,
- Ahmed I,
- Maher AR,
- Kaur K,
- Taylor J,
- Henning A,
- Ashrafian H,
- Watkins H,
- Frenneaux M
- 17.↵
- Christensen NL,
- Dahl JS,
- Carter-Storch R,
- Bakkestrøm R,
- Jensen K,
- Steffensen FH,
- Søndergaard EV,
- Videbæk L,
- Møller JE
This Issue
Article Tools
- Targeting High Oxygen Consumption to Prevent Cardiac Dysfunction in Patients With Aortic Valve StenosisJolanda van der VeldenCirculation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2017;10:e007015, originally published September 27, 2017https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007015
Citation Manager Formats