Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on March 24, 2009

Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2009
Published online before print March 24, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.826826
A more recent version of this article appeared on May 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/3/226    most recent
CIRCIMAGING.108.826826v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ronald, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rutt, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ronald, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Rutt, B. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow Imaging

Original Article

Comparison of Gadofluorine-M and Gd-DTPA for Non-Invasive Staging of Atherosclerotic Plaque Stability Using MRI

John A. Ronald1,4; Yuanxin Chen1; Andre J.-L. Belisle1; Amanda M. Hamilton1; Kem A. Rogers1; Robert A. Hegele1; Bernd Misselwitz2 and Brian K. Rutt3

1 University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada;
2 Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany;
3 Univ. of Western Ontario, Canada & Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Germany & Stanford Univ, California

4 E-mail: jronald{at}imaging.robarts.ca

Background—Inflammation and neovascularization play critical roles in the stability of atherosclerotic plaques. Whole-body quantitative assessment of these plaque features may improve patient risk-stratification for life-threatening thromboembolic events and direct appropriate intervention. Here we determined the utility of the MR contrast agent Gadofluorine-M (GdF) for staging plaque stability and compared this to the conventional agent Gd-DTPA.

Methods and Results—5 control and 7 atherosclerotic rabbits were sequentially imaged following administration of Gd-DTPA (0.2 mmol/kg) and GdF (0.1 mmol/kg) using a T1-weighted pulse sequence on a 3T MRI scanner. Diseased aortic wall could be distinguished from normal wall based on wall-to-muscle contrast-to-noise values following GdF administration. RAM-11 (macrophages) and CD-31 (endothelial cells) immunostaining of MR-matched histological sections revealed that GdF accumulation was related to the degree of inflammation at the surface of plaques and the extent of core neovascularization. Importantly, an MR measure of GdF accumulation at both 1 and 24 hours post-injection, but not Gd-DTPA at peak enhancement, was shown to correlate with a quantitative histological morphology index related to these two plaque features.

Conclusions—GdF-enhanced MRI of atherosclerotic plaques allows non-invasive quantitative information about plaque composition to be acquired at multiple time points post-injection (within 1 and up to 24 hours post-injection). This dramatically widens the imaging window for assessing plaque stability that is currently attainable with clinically approved MR agents, therefore opening the possibility of whole-body (including coronary) detection of unstable plaques in the future and potentially improved mitigation of cataclysmic cardiovascular events.

Key Words: angiogenesis • atherosclerosis • contrast media • inflammation • magnetic resonance imaging