Advances in Cardiovascular Imaging |
From the University of Queensland (T.H.M.), Brisbane, Australia, and Technische Universität of Munich (M.S.), Munich, Germany.
Correspondence to Professor T. Marwick, University of Queensland School of Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia. E-mail t.marwick{at}uq.edu.au
Key Words: electrocardiography heart failure imaging
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Functional Measurements: The Cornerstone of HF Management |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LV Volumes and Ejection Fraction
Routine techniques (contrast ventriculography, 2D echocardiography) provide real-time imaging in standard imaging planes. The only traditional method that has escaped this limitation has been radionuclide ventriculography, in which the ejection fraction is calculated from scintigraphic counts, but this introduces the separate potential problems of attenuation and overlying chambers.
Limitations of 2D Imaging
Two-dimensional imaging approaches require expert acquisition and observers and have limited reliability in obtaining appropriate cut planes in sequential studies. The limitation of requiring imaging planes in the correct axis is particularly an issue for 2D echocardiography, which may be constrained by limited imaging windows; in the pursuit of optimization of the resolution of structures, images are often obtained off-axis (Figure 1). Portrayal of a 3D object in 2 dimensions has adverse consequences with regard to the reproducibility of LV measurements. The increasing sophistication of medical treatments for LV dysfunction has created the need for accurate and reproducible measurements of chamber dimensions. Variations of imaging planes especially may pose a problem for long-term follow-up of LV volume, mass, and ejection fraction, and the evolution of these measurements may have important treatment implications.
|
|
LV Filling Profiles
The LV filling profile has an established role as a prognostic component of the imaging report of the HF patient.7 LV filling can be measured by most imaging modalities, but 2 attributes are important: frame rate of the acquisition (which allows accurate assessment of isovolumic and deceleration time) and the ability to distinguish normal from pseudonormal filling patterns. Echocardiography is the best established technique for this evaluation, and its role has been strengthened by the echocardiographic estimation of filling pressure.8 This is derived from the ratio of passive filling and myocardial velocities (E/E'; Figure 3) and is likely to assume increasing importance in relation to new diagnostic criteria9 and application to patient care management.
|
LV shape is a marker of the severity of HF and predicts outcome. This is most simply measured as the sphericity index (ratio of the maximum long- and short-axis dimensions), although this may be limited by regional problems, and a more global (perhaps 3D) measurement may be more useful.12 Both 3DE and CMR have been used in planning LV reconstruction13,14; more sophisticated measurements of curvature may become important for this purpose.
The shape of the heart in LV hypertrophy may also be important. Small hearts have low transmural stress. Current techniques assume wall stress is uniform for the entire LV; it is hoped that the availability of 3D measurements of curvature will enable regional assessment of wall stress in the future.
Mitral Regurgitation
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with outcome in HF.15 Functional MR is common, especially in ischemic cardiomyopathy, accounting for 50% of postinfarction patients with HF, and ischemic MR increases mortality even when MR is mild.16 New surgical and percutaneous devices, as well as an extension of the indications for cardiac resynchronization to the control of LV remodeling and functional MR, are likely to increase the importance of MR evaluation in the future.
The evaluation of MR in the failing heart should include an assessment of severity and characterization of the mechanism. Functional MR severity may be difficult to assess because it may change during systole and because of the variability and complexity of jet morphology. Typically, the severity of MR is greatest in early systole and is reduced as the LV volume decreases and the mitral leaflets are pushed back into the annular plane.17 The largest jet size, or even the vena contracta dimension, may be misleading as a marker of MR severity, and volumetric methods may have some attraction for the calculation of regurgitant volume to avoid errors due to inhomogeneity of MR.
Understanding the mechanism of MR involves a consideration of both LV and mitral morphology. The major categories relate to disturbances in the inferoposterior wall (usually from infarction), LV enlargement, and dyssynchrony. The former results in displacement of the posterior papillary muscle, with tethering of the posterior leaflet, and posteriorly directed MR, whereas the second involves displacement of both papillary muscles due to LV remodeling, which leads to failure of coaptation of the mitral leaflets and a central MR jet (Figure 4). Mitral valve procedures may not be a good solution to what is a ventricular problem, and advances in this area are likely to address specific mechanisms of the process.
|
|
|
| Novel Structural Measurements in the Diagnosis and Management of HF |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Changes in the interstitium relate mainly to fibrosis. There is a major increment of interstitial and perivascular fibrous tissue in pathological hypertrophy. Fibrosis may be either reparative (a regional process that reflects healing and/or replacement by scar) or reactive (a diffuse process). In addition to an increment of the amount of this tissue, its nature is also abnormal, as evidenced by an increase in type 1 collagen. The consequences of this fibrosis include abnormal coronary flow reserve, probably related to perivascular fibrosis, as well as HF and arrhythmias. Myocardial fibrosis is believed to play a significant role in the abnormal diastolic function present in hypertension, diabetes, and the elderly and will likely become a specific target for medical therapy.
CMR Methods
After myocardial infarction, gadolinium late-enhancement CMR images identify regional fibrosis24 and infarct size and predict functional recovery. The detection of localized fibrosis is ideal for recognition by gadolinium enhancement, based on the relative comparison between the region and a reference normal segment, but the test is ineffective for identifying diffuse fibrosis. However, there is twice as much diffuse as there is regional fibrosis in ischemic cardiomyopathy,23 and this is difficult to appreciate from relative gadolinium uptake. This phenomenon may be more marked in dilated cardiomyopathy, in which midwall fibrosis is detected in
30% of patients,25 despite the fact that probably 75% have evidence of fibrosis.
Other CMR methods may be useful in the detection of fibrosis. The T1 time is shortened by fibrosis, and T1 mapping is a potentially quantifiable marker of the extent and severity of fibrosis when validated against biopsy samples26 and applied in clinical settings associated with nonischemic fibrosis.27 Differences in transverse relaxation times of hydrogen protons (T2*) reveal differences in tissue water content, which may be attributable to fibrosis.28
Ultrasonic Integrated Backscatter
Ultrasound techniques have traditionally been the test of choice for myocardial tissue characterization. In addition to reflection of ultrasound to the transducer by acoustic interfaces, some reflection derives from the tissue. The acoustic density of this tissue determines the degree of reflection, which may be measured by calibrated integrated backscatter, describing myocardial acoustic density, which is increased by fibrosis (Figure 7). Integrated backscatter is abnormal in a variety of hypertrophic and endocrine conditions. However, the technique is subject to signal noise and may never become part of the standard imaging repertoire.
|
Myocardial Performance
Ejection fraction is load dependent and insensitive to subtle disturbances of myocardial performance. Radial thickening can be measured by techniques with good spatial and contrast resolution, such as CMR; however, because of the fiber architecture of the heart and the preferential involvement of different components of the heart (eg, endocardium) in some pathologies, reduction in thickening may be nonuniform. Techniques that examine deformation in multiple axes (especially the long axis) might be expected to be more sensitive than simply wall thickening.
Tagged CMR or echocardiography may be used to measure motion as velocity (which may be influenced by translation and tethering and is therefore not site-specific), strain (an index of deformation), or strain rate. Tissue Doppler-based measurements derive strain rate from color Doppler velocity, with high temporal resolution but potential limitations caused by signal noise. 2D strain (2DS) is based on speckle tracking at frame rates of 40 to 80 frames per second (Figure 8). The optimal technique varies according to the circumstances; high frame rates (eg, tissue-velocity imaging) are more important for measuring timing (eg, postsystolic thickening) and strain rate and at high heart rates. Lower frame rates (eg, 2DS, MR tagging) may be better at rest and in remodeled hearts, in which the orientation of the wall and imaging axis may be altered along the length of the wall (Figure 9).
|
|
|
In established HF, contractile reserve, measured invasively (eg, dP/dt) or noninvasively (eg, ejection fraction or cardiac output response) is related to outcome.30 Contractile reserve also mirrors sympathetic dysfunction,31 which makes this an inexpensive surrogate for tests of sympathetic status. In the future, this information may be used in tailoring HF therapy to the status of individual patients.
The response of E/E' to stress may also be useful in the attribution of exertional dyspnea to diastolic HF.32 Conversely, the absence of raised filling pressure with exercise makes it difficult to attribute exertional dyspnea to diastolic HF. In the future, this observation may help the movement away from the diagnosis of exclusion ("HF with normal ejection fraction") to a positive diagnosis of diastolic HF.
Coronary Perfusion and Vascular Imaging
Systolic dysfunction caused by ischemic heart disease is the commonest cause of HF in the developed world.33 Rest and stress myocardial perfusion imaging can identify a subgroup of patients with HF who have potentially reversible dysfunction and are likely to benefit from revascularization.34 In LV dysfunction, a normal stress perfusion scan has high negative predictive value, but fixed and reversible perfusion defects are not specific for coronary artery disease, with fibrosis and reduced coronary reserve in nonischemic HF causing a limited specificity (40% to 80%) for SPECT and PET in HF.35
The future diagnostic workup of HF patients will most likely include vascular imaging with cardiac CT or CMR to directly assess the anatomy of epicardial coronary vessels (Figure 10). The high negative predictive value of CTA may obviate the need for invasive coronary angiography.36
|
Fatty acid represents the major source of cardiac substrate metabolism, but its complex metabolism allows only semiquantitative measurements of substrate utilization with PET imaging of carbon 11-labeled palmitate.38 More recently, iodinated fatty acids such as β-methyl-iodophenylpentadecanoic acid (BMIPP) have provided a sensitive SPECT marker of altered fatty acid transport into the myocyte. Metabolic imaging may gain clinical acceptance if clinical trials confirm that a metabolic switch from fatty acids to glucose utilization in the failing myocardium improves outcomes of patients with HF.
PET imaging of 11C-labeled acetate allows assessment of cardiac oxidative metabolism without the complexity of substrate interaction between glucose and fatty acids.39 The early rapid clearance of acetate correlates closely with myocardial oxygen consumption, and the relationship of myocardial 11C-labeled acetate kinetics to cardiac work offers a noninvasive parameter for cardiac efficiency that can be used to demonstrate the effect of pharmacological and pacing interventions on cardiac energetics.40,41
Fluorine 18-labled fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) traces cellular glucose uptake and phosphorylation and can be used to quantify regional glucose metabolism.42 18F-FDG uptake defines tissue viability within malperfused segments in patients with advanced coronary artery disease and impaired LV function.43 Hybrid imaging such as MR/PET and PET/CT combines almost simultaneous anatomic, functional, and metabolic imaging for the improved visualization of cardiac and vascular function and may provide new quantitative tools to study the pathophysiology of HF in vivo (Figure 11).
|
Cardiac Innervation
Disturbances of cardiac innervation have been associated with progression of HF, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death.47 Neuronal imaging may provide diagnostic and prognostic markers for the identification of high-risk patients and predict response to pharmacological and electrophysiological interventions. Parasympathetic LV innervation is sparse, which makes visualization of the parasympathetic presynaptic system difficult, whereas imaging of the sympathetic system is feasible and has provided promising results in HF.
Extraneuronal sympathetic neurotransmitter concentrations are regulated by an efficient amine uptake mechanism, the noradrenaline transporter (NAT), which can be used to visualize the sympathetic nerve terminal by radiolabeled norepinephrine analogues. The most commonly used SPECT tracer, metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG), undergoes avid uptake and storage in the cardiac nerve terminals but is not metabolized by monoamine oxidase. Uptake of this tracer is specific for the integrity of sympathetic nerve terminals. Cardiac MIBG uptake is measured by defining the heart-to-mediastinum uptake ratio, assessing washout kinetics, or quantifying the apex-base gradient of denervation in the failing heart.48 Iodine 123-labeled MIBG appears to have prognostic value in patients with LV dysfunction,49 and MIBG may be adopted clinically if prospective multicenter studies confirm its incremental prognostic value. Individual risk profiles for HF patients may permit more selective use of costly interventions such cardiac defibrillator implantation.50
The positron tracers [11C]hydroxyephedrine and [11C]epinephrine permit quantification of the density of sympathetic nerve terminals51,52 (Figure 12). [11C]hydroxyephedrine myocardial uptake correlates with norepinephrine tissue concentration and density of NAT. Postsynaptic β-receptor density can be assessed with [11C]CGP12177. The use of radiopharmaceuticals in imaging various aspects of neuronal function (transmitter uptake, release, metabolism, and storage) may permit guidance of pharmacological interventions and their effects on cardiac autonomic innervation.
|
The assessment of apoptosis and the assessment of angiogenesis are the initial molecular imaging tools that may help to characterize patients with HF. Apoptosis is an important mechanism of cardiomyocyte death in human myocardial infarction and HF,53 which can be imaged with labeled annexin A5. This shows selective and high-affinity binding to phospholipid exposed on the surface of apoptotic cells that triggers uptake of remnants by neighboring cells.54 Technetium Tc 99m–labeled annexin A5 demonstrates increased uptake in ischemically injured, reperfused myocardium, in nonischemic HF, and in transplant rejection.55 However, this tracer is not available for clinical use, and the development and validation of specific markers for apoptosis is needed.
Angiogenesis may be beneficial in end-stage coronary artery disease, but it is a complex and highly regulated process, which makes it challenging to develop a single imaging probe. Although both myocardial perfusion and functional recovery are final end points in the clinical evaluation of angiogenetic therapy, specific imaging markers may monitor the effect of new drugs or interventions more directly.56 Potential imaging approaches involve reporter gene imaging of vascular endothelial growth factor expression or tracers that target vascular endothelial growth factor receptors.57 The current myocardial imaging of angiogenesis has been based mainly on tracers or nanoparticles that target
vβ3, a cell membrane glycoprotein receptor that is an important mediator of angiogenesis and is highly expressed on activated endothelial cells.58,59 The cyclic peptide RGD has been used as ligand for
vβ3-integrins in combination with fluorescence in SPECT/PET imaging, with nanoparticles for CMR, and with microbubbles for contrast-enhanced ultrasound.60 Initial results in ischemic myocardium show regionally increased RGD signals, which suggests upregulated integrin expression. However, the expression of integrins by cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, and vascular cells and the potential involvement of integrins in a range of biological processes (hypertrophy, inflammation, wound healing, and scar formation) may limit the specificity of the observed RGD signal for angiogenesis. Further experimental and clinical research will focus on the specificity of the new imaging probes for angiogenesis and the prognostic and therapeutic relevance of molecular imaging signals.
Cell Monitoring
Cell transplantation is a promising future therapeutic option for patients with impaired regional or global function due to cell death.61 Methods to monitor cell migration, homing, survival, and engraftment may facilitate the understanding of heterogeneous results from early clinical investigations of intracoronary injection of bone marrow–derived cells.62 The tasks and strategies for imaging can be divided into 3 categories: short-term cell labeling, cell survival assays, and monitoring of cell differentiation.
Short-term visualization after transplantation may be obtained by direct labeling of stem cells with indium 111-labeled oxine, Tc-99m exametazime (HMPAO), or 18F-FDG, a process achievable without detectable changes in viability, functionality, migration, and proliferative capacity.63 Only a small fraction of radioactivity (<5%) is observed in the myocardium, which suggests regional retention by only a few injured cells. The duration of cell tracking ranges from a few hours with FDG-PET in human infarctions to 7 days after injection with 111In with SPECT/CT in dogs.
Paramagnetic nanoparticles can be used to facilitate nontoxic labeling of stem cells before transplantation, which would enable repeated imaging by MR. The high spatial resolution and direct correlation of cell signals to regional function and late contrast enhancement make this approach very attractive for experimental and clinical research.64 However, the signal is not directly related to cell viability, so it may lose specificity for transplanted cells after cell death and macrophage phagocytosis.
Monitoring of cell survival and differentiation requires imaging techniques linked to the integrity of cells and tissue-specific protein expression (Figure 13). Reporter gene imaging with optical imaging approaches is successful in small animal research, whereas scintigraphic techniques may be applicable to large animals and patients. Most studies label an enzyme or transporter (herpes simplex virus type I thymidine kinase) or the human iodide/symporter.65 The application of these approaches to clinical research will require further documentation of suitability and safety to pass regulatory hurdles.
|
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported in part by a Centres of Clinical Research Excellence Award from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Canberra, Australia.
Disclosures
Members of Dr Marwicks research group have collaborative research projects with GE Medical Systems, Siemens, Philips, and Lantheus Medical Imaging.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Young JB. Imaging patients with heart failure: expectations of the clinician. Heart Fail Clin. 2006; 2: 107–115.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Chuang ML, Hibberd MG, Salton CJ, Beaudin RA, Riley MF, Parker RA, Douglas PS, Manning WJ. Importance of imaging method over imaging modality in noninvasive determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: assessment by two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35: 477–484.
4. Mor-Avi V, Jenkins C, Kühl HP, Nesser HJ, Marwick T, Franke A, Ebner C, Freed BH, Steringer-Mascherbauer R, Pollard H, Weinert L, Niel J, Sugeng L, Lang RM. Real-time 3D echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular volumes: multicenter study for validation with magnetic resonance imaging and investigation of sources of error. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. In press.
5. Thomson HL, Basmadjian AJ, Rainbird AJ, Razavi M, Avierinos J-F, Pellikka PA, Bailey KR, Breen JF, Enriquez-Sarano M. Contrast echocardiography improves the accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular remodeling measurements: a prospective, randomly assigned, blinded study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38: 867–875.
6. Hoffmann R, von Bardeleben S, Kasprzak JD, Borges AC, ten Cate F, Firschke C, Lafitte S, Al-Saadi N, Kuntz-Hehner S, Horstick G, Greis C, Engelhardt M, Vanoverschelde JL, Becher H. Analysis of regional left ventricular function by cineventriculography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced echocardiography: a multicenter comparison of methods. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 121–128.
7. Somaratne JB, Whalley GA, Gamble GD, Doughty RN. Restrictive filling pattern is a powerful predictor of heart failure events postacute myocardial infarction and in established heart failure: a literature-based meta-analysis. J Card Fail. 2007; 13: 346–352.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Yu CM, Sanderson JE, Marwick TH, Oh JK. Tissue Doppler imaging a new prognosticator for cardiovascular diseases. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 1903–1914.
9. Paulus WJ, Tschope C, Sanderson JE, Rusconi C, Flachskampf FA, Rademakers FE, Marino P, Smiseth OA, De Keulenaer G, Leite-Moreira AF, Borbely A, Edes I, Handoko ML, Heymans S, Pezzali N, Pieske B, Dickstein K, Fraser AG, Brutsaert DL. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28: 2539–2550.
10. Grothues F, Smith GC, Moon JC, Bellenger NG, Collins P, Klein HU, Pennell DJ. Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. Am J Cardiol. 2002; 90: 29–34.[CrossRef][Medline]
11. Jenkins C, Bricknell K, Hanekom L, Marwick TH. Reproducibility and accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular parameters using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 878–886.
12. Mannaerts HF, van der Heide JA, Kamp O, Stoel MG, Twisk J, Visser CA. Early identification of left ventricular remodelling after myocardial infarction, assessed by transthoracic 3D echocardiography. Eur Heart J. 2004; 25: 680–687.
13. Schenk S, McCarthy PM, Starling RC, Hoercher KJ, Hail MD, Ootaki Y, Francis GS, Doi K, Young JB, Fukamachi K. Neurohormonal response to left ventricular reconstruction surgery in ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004; 128: 38–43.
14. Dor V. Surgical remodeling of left ventricle. Surg Clin North Am. 2004; 84: 27–43.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Fleischmann KE, Goldman L, Robiolio PA, Lee RT, Johnson PA, Cook EF, Lee TH. Echocardiographic correlates of survival in patients with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 23: 1390–1396.[Abstract]
16. Grigioni F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Zehr KJ, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ. Ischemic mitral regurgitation: long-term outcome and prognostic implications with quantitative Doppler assessment. Circulation. 2001; 103: 1759–1764.
17. Schwammenthal E, Chen C, Benning F, Block M, Breithardt G, Levine RA. Dynamics of mitral regurgitant flow and orifice area: physiologic application of the proximal flow convergence method: clinical data and experimental testing. Circulation. 1994; 90: 307–322.
18. Meluzin J, Spinarova L, Hude P, Krejci J, Kincl V, Panovsky R, Dusek L. Prognostic importance of various echocardiographic right ventricular functional parameters in patients with symptomatic heart failure. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005; 18: 435–444.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Larose E, Ganz P, Reynolds HG, Dorbala S, Di Carli MF, Brown KA, Kwong RY. Right ventricular dysfunction assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging predicts poor prognosis late after myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 855–862.
20. Abbas AE, Fortuin FD, Schiller NB, Appleton CP, Moreno CA, Lester SJ. A simple method for noninvasive estimation of pulmonary vascular resistance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41: 1021–1027.
21. Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, Jessup M, Konstam MA, Mancini DM, Oates JA. ACC/AHA 2005 guideline update for the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure in the adult. Circulation. 2005; 112: e154–e235.
22. Weber KT. Targeting pathological remodeling: concepts of cardioprotection and reparation. Circulation. 2000; 102: 1342–1345.
23. Beltrami CA, Finato N, Rocco M, Feruglio GA, Puricelli C, Cigola E, Quaini F, Sonnenblick EH, Olivetti G, Anversa P. Structural basis of end-stage failure in ischemic cardiomyopathy in humans. Circulation. 1994; 89: 151–163.
24. Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, Harris K, Chen E-L, Simonetti O, Bundy J, Finn JP, Klocke FJ, Judd RM. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation. 1999; 100: 1992–2002.
25. Assomull RG, Prasad SK, Lyne J, Smith G, Burman ED, Khan M, Sheppard MN, Poole-Wilson PA, Pennell DJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance, fibrosis, and prognosis in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48: 1977–1985.
26. Messroghli DR, Plein S, Higgins DM, Walters K, Jones TR, Ridgway JP, Sivananthan MU. Human myocardium: single-breath-hold MR T1 mapping with high spatial resolution: reproducibility study. Radiology. 2006; 238: 1004–1012.
27. Sparrow P, Messroghli DR, Reid S, Ridgway JP, Bainbridge G, Sivananthan MU. Myocardial T1 mapping for detection of left ventricular myocardial fibrosis in chronic aortic regurgitation: pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187: W630–W635.
28. Miller S, Helber U, Kramer U, Hahn U, Carr J, Stauder NI, Hoffmeister HM, Claussen CD. Subacute myocardial infarction: assessment by STIR T2-weighted MR imaging in comparison to regional function. MAGMA. 2001; 13: 8–14.[CrossRef][Medline]
29. Knaapen P, Boellaard R, Gotte MJ, Dijkmans PA, van Campen LM, de Cock CC, Luurtsema G, Visser CA, Lammertsma AA, Visser FC. Perfusable tissue index as a potential marker of fibrosis in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Nucl Med. 2004; 45: 1299–1304.
30. Naqvi TZ, Goel RK, Forrester JS, Siegel RJ. Myocardial contractile reserve on dobutamine echocardiography predicts late spontaneous improvement in cardiac function in patients with recent onset idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999; 34: 1537–1544.
31. Ohshima S, Isobe S, Izawa H, Nanasato M, Ando A, Yamada A, Yamada K, Kato TS, Obata K, Noda A, Nishizawa T, Kato K, Nagata K, Okumura K, Murohara T, Yokota M. Cardiac sympathetic dysfunction correlates with abnormal myocardial contractile reserve in dilated cardiomyopathy patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46: 2061–2068.
32. Burgess MI, Jenkins C, Sharman JE, Marwick TH. Diastolic stress echocardiography: hemodynamic validation and clinical significance of estimation of ventricular filling pressure with exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 47: 1891–1900.
33. Fox KF, Cowie MR, Wood DA, Coats AJS, Gibbs JSR, Underwood SR, Turner RM, Poole-Wilson PA, Davies SW, Sutton GC. Coronary artery disease as the cause of incident heart failure in the population. Eur Heart J. 2001; 22: 228–236.
34. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, Bateman TM, Messer JV, Berman DS, O'Gara PT, Carabello BA, Russell RO Jr, Cerqueira MD, St. John Sutton MG, DeMaria AN. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1404–1418.
35. Danias PG, Papaioannou GI, Ahlberg AW, O'Sullivan DM, Mann A, Boden WE, Heller GV. Usefulness of electrocardiographic-gated stress technetium-99m sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography to differentiate ischemic from nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2004; 94: 14–19.[CrossRef][Medline]
36. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS, Carr JJ, Goldpin JG, Greenland P, Guerci AD, Lima JAC, Rader DJ, Rubin GD, Shaw LJ, Wiegers SE. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography. Circulation. 2006; 114: 1761–1791.
37. Ashrafian H, Frenneaux MP, Opie LH. Metabolic mechanisms in heart failure. Circulation. 2007; 116: 434–448.
38. Schwaiger M, Hicks R. The clinical role of metabolic imaging of the heart by positron emission tomography. J Nucl Med. 1991; 32: 565–578.
39. Buxton DB, Schwaiger M, Nguyen A, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Radiolabeled acetate as a tracer of myocardial tricarboxylic acid cycle flux. Circ Res. 1988; 63: 628–634.
40. Beanlands RS, Nahmias C, Gordon E, Coates G, deKemp R, Firnau G, Fallen E. The effects of beta(1)-blockade on oxidative metabolism and the metabolic cost of ventricular work in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, positron-emission tomography study. Circulation. 2000; 102: 2070–2075.
41. Ukkonen H, Beanlands RS, Burwash IG, deKemp RA, Nahmias C, Fallen E, Hill MR, Tang AS. Effect of cardiac resynchronization on myocardial efficiency and regional oxidative metabolism. Circulation. 2003; 107: 28–31.
42. Gambhir SS, Schwaiger M, Huang SC, Krivokapich J, Schelbert HR, Nienaber CA, Phelps ME. Simple noninvasive quantification method for measuring myocardial glucose utilization in humans employing positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 deoxyglucose. J Nucl Med. 1989; 30: 359–366.
43. Tillisch J, Brunken R, Marshall R, Schwaiger M, Mandelkern M, Phelps M, Schelbert H. Reversibility of cardiac wall-motion abnormalities predicted by positron tomography. N Engl J Med. 1986; 314: 884–888.[Abstract]
44. Neubauer S. The failing heart: an engine out of fuel. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1140–1151.
45. Smith CS, Bottomley PA, Schulman SP, Gerstenblith G, Weiss RG. Altered creatine kinase adenosine triphosphate kinetics in failing hypertrophied human myocardium. Circulation. 2006; 114: 1151–1158.
46. Golman K, Petersson JS, Magnusson P, Johansson E, Akeson P, Chai C-M, Hansson G, Mansson S. Cardiac metabolism measured noninvasively by hyperpolarized (13)C MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2008; 59: 1005–1013.[CrossRef][Medline]
47. Bristow MR. The autonomic nervous system in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1984; 311: 850–851.[Medline]
48. Carrio I. Cardiac neurotransmission imaging. J Nucl Med. 2001; 42: 1062–1076.
49. Merlet P, Benvenuti C, Moyse D, Pouillart F, Dubois-Rande J-L, Duval A-M, Loisance D, Castaigne A, Syrota A. Prognostic value of MIBG imaging in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Nucl Med. 1999; 40: 917–923.
50. Arora R, Ferrick KJ, Nakata T, Kaplan RC, Rozengarten M, Latif F, Ng K, Marcano V, Heller S, Fisher JD, Travin MI. I-123 MIBG imaging and heart rate variability analysis to predict the need for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. J Nucl Cardiol. 2003; 10: 121–131.[CrossRef][Medline]
51. Schwaiger M, Kalff V, Rosenspire K, Haka MS, Molina E, Hutchins GD, Deeb M, Wolfe E Jr, Wieland DM. Noninvasive evaluation of sympathetic nervous system in human heart by positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1990; 82: 457–464.
52. Caldwell JH, Link JM, Levy WC, Poole JE, Stratton JR. Evidence for pre- to postsynaptic mismatch of the cardiac sympathetic nervous system in ischemic congestive heart failure. J Nucl Med. 2008; 49: 234–241.
53. Narula J, Haider N, Virmani R, DiSalvo TG, Kolodgie FD, Hajjar RJ, Schmidt U, Semigran MJ, Dec GW, Khaw BA. Apoptosis in myocytes in end-stage heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335: 1182–1189.
54. Fadok VA, Voelker DR, Campbell PA, Cohen JJ, Bratton DL, Henson PM. Exposure of phosphatidylserine on the surface of apoptotic lymphocytes triggers specific recognition and removal by macrophages. J Immunol. 1992; 148: 2207–2216.[Abstract]
55. Dumont EA, Reutelingsperger CP, Smits JF, Daemen MJ, Doevendans PA, Wellens HJ, Hofstra L. Real-time imaging of apoptotic cell-membrane changes at the single-cell level in the beating murine heart. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 1352–1355.[CrossRef][Medline]
56. Narula J, Acio ER, Narula N, Samuels LE, Fyfe B, Wood D, Fitzpatrick JM, Raghunath PN, Tomaszewski JE, Kelly C, Steinmetz N, Green A, Tait JF, Leppo J, Blankenberg FG, Jain D, Strauss HW. Annexin-V imaging for noninvasive detection of cardiac allograft rejection. Nat Med. 2001; 7: 1347–1352.[CrossRef][Medline]
57. Simons M, Bonow RO, Chronos NA, Cohen DJ, Giordano FJ, Hammond K, Laham RJ, Li W, Pike M, Sellke FW, Stegmann TJ, Udelson JE, Rosengart TK. Clinical trials in coronary angiogenesis: issues, problems, consensus: An expert panel summary. Circulation. 2000; 102: E73–E86.[Medline]
58. Lu E, Wagner WR, Schellenberger U, Abraham JA, Klibanov AL, Woulfe SR, Csikari MM, Fischer D, Schreiner GF, Brandenburger GH, Villanueva FS. Targeted in vivo labeling of receptors for vascular endothelial growth factor: approach to identification of ischemic tissue. Circulation. 2003; 108: 97–103.
59. Brooks PC, Clark RA, Cheresh DA. Requirement of vascular integrin alpha v beta 3 for angiogenesis. Science. 1994; 264: 569–571.
60. Winter PM, Morawski AM, Caruthers SD, Fuhrhop RW, Zhang H, Williams TA, Allen JS, Lacy EK, Robertson JD, Lanza GM, Wickline SA. Molecular imaging of angiogenesis in early-stage atherosclerosis with alpha(v)beta3-integrin-targeted nanoparticles. Circulation. 2003; 108: 2270–2274.
61. Rosenzweig A. Cardiac cell therapy: mixed results from mixed cells. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 1274–1277.
62. Beeres SL, Bengel FM, Bartunek J, Atsma DE, Hill JM, Vanderheyden M, Penicka M, Schalij MJ, Wijns W, Bax JJ. Role of imaging in cardiac stem cell therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 49: 1137–1148.
63. Kraitchman DL, Tatsumi M, Gilson WD, Ishimori T, Kedziorek D, Walczak P, Segars WP, Chen HH, Fritzges D, Izbudak I, Young RG, Marcelino M, Pittenger MF, Solaiyappan M, Boston RC, Tsui BMW, Wahl RL, Bulte JWM. Dynamic imaging of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells trafficking to myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2005; 112: 1451–1461.
64. Hill JM, Dick AJ, Raman VK, Thompson RB, Yu Z-X, Hinds KA, Pessanha BS, Guttman MA, Varney TR, Martin BJ, Dunbar CE, McVeigh ER, Lederman RJ. Serial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of injected mesenchymal stem cells. Circulation. 2003; 108: 1009–1014.
65. Wu JC, Inubushi M, Sundaresan G, Schelbert HR, Gambhir SS. Positron emission tomography imaging of cardiac reporter gene expression in living rats. Circulation. 2002; 106: 180–183.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. H. Marwick and M. Schwaiger The Future of Cardiovascular Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure, Part 2: Clinical Applications Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, September 1, 2008; 1(2): 162 - 170. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | Circulation Journals Home | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2008 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |