Editorial |
From the Departments of Medicine/Cardiology (J.H.C.) and Radiology/Nuclear Medicine (J.H.C., J.M.L.), University of Washington, Seattle, Wash.
Correspondence to James H. Caldwell, MD, Box 356113, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195. E-mail jcald@u.washington.edu
Key Words: Editorials imaging infarction radioisotopes receptors
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
| Introduction |
|---|
Article see p 365
Given the wealth of data demonstrating that HRV and its derivatives provide useful but not highly predictive clinical information and at a relatively low cost, what added value is gained by the use of a complicated and expensive imaging method? There are limitations to measurement of HRV that generally require the patient to be in sinus rhythm without sinoatrial dysfunction, to have
20% ectopic beats, have good quality tracings and, ideally, at least 24 hours of recording.2 The requirement for sinus rhythm limits it application in the largest population in which it is most likely beneficial, those with heart failure. Also, imaging of presynaptic sympathetic function has been shown to better predict adverse events.6 The results of the Mazzadi et al1 study suggest that imaging of
Related Article
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009 2: 365-372.
|
Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | Circulation Journals Home | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2009 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |