Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on August 17, 2009

Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2009
Published online before print August 17, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.801712
A more recent version of this article appeared on September 1, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
2/5/391    most recent
CIRCIMAGING.108.801712v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sirol, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fayad, Z.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sirol, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fayad, Z.
Related Collections
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Imaging

Original Article

Increased Neovascularization in Advanced Lipid-Rich Atherosclerotic Lesions Detected by Gadofluorine-M Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): Implications for Plaque Vulnerability

Marc Sirol1,5; Pedro Moreno2; K-Raman Purushothaman2; Esad Vucic2; Vardan Amirbekian2; Hanns-Joachim Weinmann3; Paul Munter2; Valentin Fuster4 and Zahi Fayad2

1 Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France; Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY;
2 Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY;
3 Schering AG, Berlin, Germany;
4 Mount Sinai School of Med., New York, NY; CNIC, Madrid, Spain

* Corresponding author; email: marc.sirol{at}lrb.aphp.fr

Background—Inflammation and neovascularization may play a significant role in atherosclerotic plaque progression and rupture. We evaluated Gadofluorine-M enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of plaque inflammation and neovascularization in an animal model of atherosclerosis.

Methods and Results—Sixteen rabbits with aortic plaque and 6 normal controls underwent Gadofluorine-M enhanced MRI. Eight rabbits had advanced atherosclerotic lesions whereas the remaining 8 had early lesions. MR atherosclerotic plaque enhancement was meticulously compared to plaque inflammation and neovessel density as assessed by histopathology. Advanced plaques and early atheroma were enhanced after Gadofluorine-M injection. Control animals displayed no enhancement. After accounting for the within-animal correlation of observations, mean contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was significantly higher in advanced plaques than compared to early atheroma (4.29±0.21 vs 3.00±0.32; P=0.004). Macrophage density was higher in advanced plaques in comparison to early atheroma (geometric mean = 0.43 [95% CI = 0.29-0.64] vs. 0.21 [0.12-0.37]; P=0.05). Furthermore, higher neovessel density was observed in advanced plaques (1.83 [95% CI: 1.51–2.21] vs 1.29 [0.99–1.69]; P=0.050). The plaque accumulation of Gadofluorine-M correlated with increased neovessel density as shown by linear regression analysis (r = 0.67; P < 0.001). Confocal and fluorescence microscopy revealed co-localization of Gadofluorine-M with plaque areas containing a high density of neovessels.

Conclusion—Gadofluorine-M enhanced MRI is effective for in vivo detection of atherosclerotic plaque inflammation and neovascularization in an animal model of atherosclerosis. These findings suggest that Gadofluorine-M enhancement reflects the presence of high-risk plaque features believed to be associated with plaque rupture. Gadofluorine-M plaque enhancement may therefore provide functional assessment of atherosclerotic plaque, in vivo.

Key Words: atherosclerosis • imaging • magnetic resonance imaging • plaque